A New Wire Project: Roman/Greek Fibulae

I've been looking for ways to expand the collection of period items I can make, using the materials and tools I have on hand. Anything made of wire, therefore, has been an obvious choice for experimentation. I was browsing around Pinterest and came across an Instructibles tutorial for Roman Fibulae, and it caught my attention. They seemed really simple to make, and I thought they'd be a nice alternative to wire-wrap wrings for largesse and tokens at A&S displays.

The directions call for 16-gauge wire. The closest I had on hand was 18-gauge, silver-plated wire, so I used that. I opted for only four loops instead of five, and I couldn't do the hammering part because my husband was asleep just down the hall (oh, how wonderful it will be to finally move into our house, where I will have a workshop!).

Forming the "catch".

When I finished my first attempt, I had about two inches of wire leftover. Therefore, I cut only a nine inch length for my second attempt. My loops were much closer together on the second fibula, so I *still* wound up with about an inch of excess wire, even though I increased from four loops to five.

First (top) and second fibulae complete.

I still need to file the tips of the pins into points, so that they can piece fabric to be worn.

After I make a handful more of these simple fibula, I want to begin experiments to recreate some (pre-)period extant pieces:

800 B.C. Northern Greece. Harvard Art Museum.

800 B.C. Central Europe.

500 B.C. Halstatt, Austria.

300 B.C. Roman.

Atlantia KASF 2017

In years past, I have displayed at Atlantia's KASF as part of a group--the first time with my household, and the second time with the Barony of Lochmere. This year, I displayed by myself, as the A&S Champion for the Barony of Concordia of the Snows. Because I'm a champion of the East and not Atlantia, I did not participate in the Inter-Baronial Champions' Competition. Rather, I entered the open display. I received some delightful feedback about my work, particularly from the Baron of Nottinghill Coill (who was also astounded when he learned I had traveled from upstate NY to attend the event!).

Documentation text:

Comparing Copper and Silver as Used in Viking Wire Weave

A few years ago at Pennsic, an old friend sat down with me beneath our baronial pavilion and taught me to make Viking Wire Weave chains (sometimes also called Viking Knit or Trichinopoly). I took to it almost immediately, and began entering pieces in A&S competitions and displays shortly thereafter.

In one such competition at the Feast for St. Brigit in the Barony of Lochmere, I entered two necklaces. These were woven of what had become my go-to material: 26-gauge, dead soft, enameled copper wire. I like that it was inexpensive but still easy to work with – less prone to kinks and tangles than cheaper options at my local Michael's. I also like the array of color options available, because I could achieve a period look (most extant examples are woven of silver wire) or a less-period, heraldic chain, as desired.

Copper was a solid and reasonable substitute for silver, with valid reasons for its selection. On a molecular level, copper is very similar to silver and behaves in much the same way when worked. Additionally, as stated above, it was available in a silver-colored enamel. And, of course, it was far less expensive than actual silver wire.

In her judge's feedback that day, Mistress Mary Isabel of Heatherstone suggested I try working in real silver, even if only once, so that I could gain a deeper understanding of how it differs from copper by actually feeling it as I work, rather than just reading about the differences.

It has taken me two years to work up the courage, make the investment, and take that plunge. I have to admit that I was skeptical before I started. How different could it actually be, anyway? By this point, I had worked with copper in gauges ranging from 20 to 28 and in tempers from dead soft to half hard. I expected this experiment to demonstrate only which temper produced a similar feel, and perhaps to reveal a slight difference in the silver color of the chains.

Boy, was I in for a surprise.

For the purposes of this experiment, I selected 28-gauge, dead soft wire in enameled copper and sterling silver. I used the same mandrel, and wove identical chains of six-loop, double-weave knit. I began with the copper chain.

From the moment I began to weave with the silver, I could feel a difference. Though it was the same gauge as the copper, it felt more substantial in my fingers. More stable, perhaps. It was certainly less prone to kinking as I worked with it. It was somehow smoother, too. It made me think of satin. I was somewhat confounded as I continued to work. How could something be sturdier and softer, at the same time?

Unlike with the enameled copper, I didn't have to worry about friction with the silver as I wove. With the copper, there's a risk that the scraping will damage the enamel finish, causing the color to flake off.

Containing the loose ends of each piece of wire seemed easier with the silver as well. In running my hands along the woven chain, there are noticeably fewer “poky bits” protruding from the silver than from the copper (You are welcome to try that on these pieces, but please slide your fingers lightly and slowly! I wouldn't want you to injure yourself).

For this display, I left the chains incomplete (when finished, they will be necklaces). I drew them through a wooden drawplate for about half of their length, so that I would have examples of the chains both drawn and undrawn.

The finished pieces are all enameled copper, displayed to show the variety of weaves and designs possible with Viking Wire Weave.

I look forward to working more in silver (as finances allow) in the future – it was a true pleasure to work with!